The Big Bang And Collapse
#1
Posted 22 February 2008 - 04:15 PM
Anna
![]()
#2
Posted 25 February 2008 - 01:14 AM
#4
Posted 25 February 2008 - 05:39 AM
At one time we thought it possible for everything to expand and then collapse, but that is only if you think of the universe as a growing 3D ball or something.
Imagine the universe like this: it's hard to do....
Imagine you have a balloon, and you begin to blow up the balloon, you'd expect the analogy to be that the increasing volume of the balloon represents the universe, this is incorrect. The actual thin rubber balloon stretching is what our universe is like... This is hard to imagine because it's like trying to imagine putting a 2 dimensional object into a 4 dimensional space and our brains really have no grasp of that. So as the universe expands as the SURFACE of the balloon, everything begins to stretch and spread out.
I realize I kind of got off topic.... but I could discuss stuff like this for hours... it's sad but true.
As for affecting us.... it really won't, except for in the far future if we venture to other planets, it will take longer to get there, as the distance is constantly increasing at large fractions of the speed of light. It's strange to think about, that out there at this second as you're reading this.... entire galaxies are moving away from us at blinding rates.
#5
Posted 26 February 2008 - 06:59 AM
Mathieu, on Feb 24 2008, 11:39 PM, said:
At one time we thought it possible for everything to expand and then collapse, but that is only if you think of the universe as a growing 3D ball or something.
Imagine the universe like this: it's hard to do....
Imagine you have a balloon, and you begin to blow up the balloon, you'd expect the analogy to be that the increasing volume of the balloon represents the universe, this is incorrect. The actual thin rubber balloon stretching is what our universe is like... This is hard to imagine because it's like trying to imagine putting a 2 dimensional object into a 4 dimensional space and our brains really have no grasp of that. So as the universe expands as the SURFACE of the balloon, everything begins to stretch and spread out.
I realize I kind of got off topic.... but I could discuss stuff like this for hours... it's sad but true.
As for affecting us.... it really won't, except for in the far future if we venture to other planets, it will take longer to get there, as the distance is constantly increasing at large fractions of the speed of light. It's strange to think about, that out there at this second as you're reading this.... entire galaxies are moving away from us at blinding rates.
#6
Posted 26 February 2008 - 05:42 PM
We have found a few peices of this stuff.. By a few "peices" i mean under 1000 molecules of it. It resonates a negative (push) graviational feild in dense numbers. The full theory is eventually as galaxies merge together and become super clusters, they will than have the gravitational force to offset this.
Nasa's (and several other scientists) are playing around with Dark Matter drives, which although could be exteremly dangerous would provide us with a means of inter-solar (or if built well enough close instance interstellar) travel. Providing we do not manage to actually create "warp" technology (see Star Trek) only reason I bring this up, is because its a actually a working theory and based on our current understanding of light, speed, and how projections work is possible but thats an entirely other long ass topic.
Robert Leiper | Create Your Badge

#7
Posted 27 February 2008 - 01:23 AM
#8
Posted 27 February 2008 - 04:40 AM
Mathieu, on Feb 26 2008, 07:23 PM, said:
1) "Dark Energy" = Theory
2) Dark Matter = Fact
3) All Matter is energy
Once there are actual facts and real proof regarding "dark energy", than by all means you can make corrections to my statements
Robert Leiper | Create Your Badge

#9
Posted 27 February 2008 - 05:45 AM
Dark matter is just any matter we currently have no way of seeing... as far was we know... all of that unaccounted-for mass in the universe could be made up of floating elephants wearing gas masks and high heels, (of course it's not and it's probably really just dead stars that don't emit light and other random heavy particles from somewhere).... if you convert dark matter into energy... it doesn't become dark energy... it would just be photons and radiation.
So.... I guess we can agree to disagree on this one... but I'm still not seeing dark matter and dark energy as being the same thing.
And as for proof... well the fact that the entire universe is accelerating away from itself because of some unidentified energy source is proof enough for me... we may not know what exactly causes the force.... but that doesn't mean there isn't a force....
Maybe dark energy is sort of like gravity... I've heard a few different theories as to what gravity actually IS.... I've heard some scientists talk about gravitons... little weird shaped things that influence mass.... and I've also heard that gravity is a force without form and that the curvature of space and time IS gravity, and that there's no actual physical form to it..... I'm looking forward to the day that people figure all this out.
#10
Posted 07 July 2008 - 05:23 AM
Kung-Fu Barbie, on Feb 22 2008, 11:15 AM, said:
I know nothing about the big bang, but I have a friend who did a presentation in class about it.
#11
Posted 21 April 2009 - 05:35 AM
Your Fearless Leader!
Robbie
#12
Posted 23 November 2009 - 07:41 PM
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
















